For this weeks blog I’m focusing on liabilities within the
recording industry and the entertainment industry as a whole.
The first case I came upon was rather disturbing in nature
really. A woman named Nicole Westmoreland is suing Cash Money Records because
she was allegedly sexually assaulted in the studio’s bathroom. She said she was
at the studio to make a business proposal and was assaulted before giving the
presentation. Her serious claim to liability was that the alleged assaulter was
a friend of the studio owners and they were aware that he was dangerous. I find
myself agreeing with the woman in this case that the owners are liable. The
owners claim that her story about what occurred is incorrect and that the
company “is not liable for criminal acts of an employee, unless they should
have foreseen those acts were going to occur.” As owners, they are responsible
for knowing who is in their studio and that the people they allow to be there,
whether employees or friends, on the company’s property and on the company’s time,
represent them. While no one should plan for sexual assault on their studio’s
premises, criminal acts are something that should be considered when thinking
about liabilities.
The next case I found was much simpler and definitely a cut
and dry outcome. Recently, Dr. Dre has been sued by Paramount for failure to
pay his bills. They are claiming breach of contract and over a large sum of
time that Dre had rented out the studio. The Studio is suing for $1,220,500 and
it seems they’re going to get it. These kinds of cases always seem so
ridiculous to me. Dre’s got plenty of cash to pay and all he had to do was pay
it by July 13th. Now I’m sure he’s going to have to pay more and he
looses a valuable industry relation over money he’s now going to have to give
them anyway. Without knowing more details, shame on you Dre.
The third I looked into is more of a movie issue, although
the premise is the same across many more media outlets. Back in 2011, the
company behind The Hurt Locker (Voltage Pictures) decided to sue 24,583
different people over sharing their movie over the Internet. Now this is by no
means a new issue and companies are suing over this torrent stuff everyday, but
what I found interesting is some of the defendant actions. ISP information is
tricky and has a lot of available loopholes. If the ISP information is stored
in RAM it’s not solid evidence what’s its relating to. Some people claim it was
others using their Internet that committed the offense. And where the servers
are located that provide the files, may make the United States unable to even touch
the information. But in 119 motions the judge decided to dismiss all of them.
Now I am an avid believer in the fact that downloading is a good thing and
unstoppable at this point. The industry needs to learn to adapt and change the
way it does business. This is such a horrible step in the wrong direction and
simply a money grab. The article states that Voltage is interested in offering
settlements to the parties. If half of the people accused accept, the company
makes more money off of them then the movie made in the box office. Why not
just make them pay double blu-ray rates for the loss? 24,000 people giving up
120 bucks is still almost 3 million. Can they really justify loosing that much?
Regardless of how I feel about it, this whole torrent thing isn’t going away.
Studios and other entertainment companies should just start to anticipate and
compensate.